http://www.liberal.ca/en/newsroom/media-releases/17326_liberals-are-working-while-conservatives-take-extended-vacation
Why is Iggy not leading the discussion on Jobs? Its the most pressing issue facing Canadians.
I know leaders should delegate, but Canadians want to see their leaders with their sleeves rolled up trying to get our people back to work.
I'll be asking that at the live townhall meeting on facebook today.
21 January 2010
20 January 2010
Josh & Matt's Potpourri - The First Waft
Hello Friends,
Welcome to Josh and Matt's Potpourri!
The motto for the Centre Block is "The Life and Times of a country called Canada. Politics, Culture, and More." We feel that we probably fall into the "more" category...or possibly "and."
Here's a little bit about us:
--------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm Josh Bresnahan. James and I were talking over a pint and he asked me if I would write for his blog. At first, I told him that I could not commit to writing a political blog because I don't get as 'excited' about politics enough to be a regular contributor. He said I didn't have to write about politics and that I could write about whatever I wanted! I thought this would be more fun if I did this with a friend because I sometimes lack ideas and motivation. I asked my friend, Matt Outerson, to help write the blog with me. He said something about being an environmentalist...so, I hit him, stole his wallet (there was no money) and when he came to, he agreed!
Let me tell you about myself. I am a 25 year old Virgo, and a proud Brantfordian/Brantfordite. I grew up on the gray streets of Grey Street playing street hockey in an old factory and collecting various syringes. I am currently a packaging engineering student that enjoys baseball, fishing, water skiing, long walks on the beach with my best girl Amanda (we're going steady ;^D) and hanging out with my BFFs. I also spend a lot of my free time helping out as an officer/instructor with the local Royal Canadian Sea Cadet unit (a great FREE youth organization) and playing in a local music group.
Josh Bresnahan
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm Matt Outerson. When Josh suggested we partake in a blog together, I asked myself, "What in the world is a blog?" Webster's Dictionary defines blogging as: 'the process of cutting trees for lumber'. I told Josh that I didn't have any interest in leaving my comfortable office setting to chop wood for a living. He punched me in the nose and when I came to; he explained what a blog actually was and convinced me to help out!
Allow myself to introduce myself. I am a 27 year old living in Paris, Ontario, Canada. I grew up in the 'dark alleys' of Eagle Place in Brantford, Ontario, Canada. I'm currently working as a POS/SBT Analyst at The News Group in Burlington, Ontario, Canada. I love music, watching hockey and spreading butter on toast. I spend most of my free time with a guy named Jimmy enjoying the free internet at the public library and I play in three local skiffle groups.
Please don't judge me because I'm tall.
Matt Outerson
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
We have decided on a fun format for all of you:
1) Pick things to talk about.
2) Wait to see if anybody cares.
Please feel free to comment on our work.
XOXO,
Josh & Matt
Welcome to Josh and Matt's Potpourri!
The motto for the Centre Block is "The Life and Times of a country called Canada. Politics, Culture, and More." We feel that we probably fall into the "more" category...or possibly "and."
Here's a little bit about us:
--------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm Josh Bresnahan. James and I were talking over a pint and he asked me if I would write for his blog. At first, I told him that I could not commit to writing a political blog because I don't get as 'excited' about politics enough to be a regular contributor. He said I didn't have to write about politics and that I could write about whatever I wanted! I thought this would be more fun if I did this with a friend because I sometimes lack ideas and motivation. I asked my friend, Matt Outerson, to help write the blog with me. He said something about being an environmentalist...so, I hit him, stole his wallet (there was no money) and when he came to, he agreed!
Let me tell you about myself. I am a 25 year old Virgo, and a proud Brantfordian/Brantfordite. I grew up on the gray streets of Grey Street playing street hockey in an old factory and collecting various syringes. I am currently a packaging engineering student that enjoys baseball, fishing, water skiing, long walks on the beach with my best girl Amanda (we're going steady ;^D) and hanging out with my BFFs. I also spend a lot of my free time helping out as an officer/instructor with the local Royal Canadian Sea Cadet unit (a great FREE youth organization) and playing in a local music group.
Josh Bresnahan
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm Matt Outerson. When Josh suggested we partake in a blog together, I asked myself, "What in the world is a blog?" Webster's Dictionary defines blogging as: 'the process of cutting trees for lumber'. I told Josh that I didn't have any interest in leaving my comfortable office setting to chop wood for a living. He punched me in the nose and when I came to; he explained what a blog actually was and convinced me to help out!
Allow myself to introduce myself. I am a 27 year old living in Paris, Ontario, Canada. I grew up in the 'dark alleys' of Eagle Place in Brantford, Ontario, Canada. I'm currently working as a POS/SBT Analyst at The News Group in Burlington, Ontario, Canada. I love music, watching hockey and spreading butter on toast. I spend most of my free time with a guy named Jimmy enjoying the free internet at the public library and I play in three local skiffle groups.
Please don't judge me because I'm tall.
Matt Outerson
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
We have decided on a fun format for all of you:
1) Pick things to talk about.
2) Wait to see if anybody cares.
Please feel free to comment on our work.
XOXO,
Josh & Matt
15 January 2010
Ignattieff: University of Calgary
I encourage you to all check back here in the coming days, our Calgary Correspondany, Matt Mc, was at the Michael Ignattieff Press Conference in Calgary.
Thats right folks, The Centre Block got press credentials!
The article on the visit to U of C should be great!
Thats right folks, The Centre Block got press credentials!
The article on the visit to U of C should be great!
12 January 2010
"Chretien Did It..."
http://www.leaderpost.com/opinion/Chretien+also+prorogued/2431020/story.html
Two wrongs don't make a right.
Stephen Harper was elected in 2006 because he claimed he was different then the Liberals.
Two wrongs don't make a right.
Stephen Harper was elected in 2006 because he claimed he was different then the Liberals.
06 January 2010
Scan Me All You Want
I have no problem being scanned while travelling by air. I personally don't view it was an infringement to my right to privacy.
These scanners are too little... almost too late.
If you disagree, feel free to do so, but I think this is a case of where our collective security matters more.
We cannot be free if we live in fear. These scanners will help end that fear. If in fact, as I read today that the Government ordered these scanners months ago, then I congratulate the Harper Government on being ahead on something.
That said, we need more human intelligence. We can't trust machines. I hope that when Parliament resumes, all political parties put forward that we invest in our security services so that we all may be safe - and not rely solely on security measures at airports.
These scanners are too little... almost too late.
If you disagree, feel free to do so, but I think this is a case of where our collective security matters more.
We cannot be free if we live in fear. These scanners will help end that fear. If in fact, as I read today that the Government ordered these scanners months ago, then I congratulate the Harper Government on being ahead on something.
That said, we need more human intelligence. We can't trust machines. I hope that when Parliament resumes, all political parties put forward that we invest in our security services so that we all may be safe - and not rely solely on security measures at airports.
Post #100: An Open Letter to Michael Ignatieff
Readers: To mark our 100th post, I am commenting on the news story that the Liberal Party is returning to Ottawa on January 25th, with an Open Letter to Michael Ignatieff I have further comments after the letter concludes.
------
Dear Mr. Ignatieff:
Canadians want Parliament to work.
We elected this parliament so that the business of the people could be conducted. I've read that you intend for your caucus to return to work on January 25th, even though Parliament has been prorogued.
We hope that Members of Parliament of all political stripes join your caucus in doing so. We pay you all far too much have an extended vacation. This year will be important to our economic recovery, and we need our elected representatives at work. Most of us are not fortunate enough to make 155 000 a year. Because of that we expect hard work to be conducted on our behalf.
I hope that you take this time to stake out a clear vision for Canada. For far too long you and the other opposition parties have stood for nothing - except not being Conservatives. This will not do.
You have accused Stephen Harper of eroding our democracy. But your party and that of the NDP and Bloc Quebecois have done nothing to defend it. You are equally guilty as the Prime Minister. Democracy only thrives when there are competing visions of the future.
The Liberal Party, as well as the Conservative Party, used to stand for something. Each with their own clear vision of Canada. The party of MacDonald has betrayed its honourable tory tradition, and the party of Laurier, Pearson, and Trudeau has lost its vision.
We expect more from all of you, especially you Mr Ignatieff, you have travelled the world, you have seen, especially by comparison to the rest of the world, how wonderful our democracy has been since 1867. Please don't let us down.
-----
Readers: If you agree, please distribute via your blogs, e-mails, etc. I also encourage you to call your local member of parliament, regardless of party, to get back to work in Ottawa on January 25th.
Keep Watch.
------
Dear Mr. Ignatieff:
Canadians want Parliament to work.
We elected this parliament so that the business of the people could be conducted. I've read that you intend for your caucus to return to work on January 25th, even though Parliament has been prorogued.
We hope that Members of Parliament of all political stripes join your caucus in doing so. We pay you all far too much have an extended vacation. This year will be important to our economic recovery, and we need our elected representatives at work. Most of us are not fortunate enough to make 155 000 a year. Because of that we expect hard work to be conducted on our behalf.
I hope that you take this time to stake out a clear vision for Canada. For far too long you and the other opposition parties have stood for nothing - except not being Conservatives. This will not do.
You have accused Stephen Harper of eroding our democracy. But your party and that of the NDP and Bloc Quebecois have done nothing to defend it. You are equally guilty as the Prime Minister. Democracy only thrives when there are competing visions of the future.
The Liberal Party, as well as the Conservative Party, used to stand for something. Each with their own clear vision of Canada. The party of MacDonald has betrayed its honourable tory tradition, and the party of Laurier, Pearson, and Trudeau has lost its vision.
We expect more from all of you, especially you Mr Ignatieff, you have travelled the world, you have seen, especially by comparison to the rest of the world, how wonderful our democracy has been since 1867. Please don't let us down.
-----
Readers: If you agree, please distribute via your blogs, e-mails, etc. I also encourage you to call your local member of parliament, regardless of party, to get back to work in Ottawa on January 25th.
Keep Watch.
05 January 2010
Centre Block: Prorogation Edition
Please note that until parliament resumes that The Centre Block will be a Prorogation Edition.
It doesn't really change very much of what we will be doing around here. Hell, it'll be more then Parliament. Except we don't collect a paycheque.
I was away for the holidays and came back to this, and am still sorting through it. I have an opinion, but I want to refine it for all of our fine readers. I will read and listen over the next little bit and comment on what we should keep expecting in Canada: Stephen Harper Edition. (TM - Me, 2010).
On a side note, I really appreciate how far we've come here in so little time. Our newest contributor Adam David wrote a wonderful piece defending prorogation. Even though I disagree with him, I encourage you to read and comment.
In the mean time, call your MP and complain that he or she isn't in Ottawa doing the work YOU are paying them to do.
We also have a new email address: centreblockblog@gmail.com feel free to email us and complain or comment!
Stay tuned for announcements on new features we hope to introduce in the coming days, weeks, and months.
Keep Watch!
It doesn't really change very much of what we will be doing around here. Hell, it'll be more then Parliament. Except we don't collect a paycheque.
I was away for the holidays and came back to this, and am still sorting through it. I have an opinion, but I want to refine it for all of our fine readers. I will read and listen over the next little bit and comment on what we should keep expecting in Canada: Stephen Harper Edition. (TM - Me, 2010).
On a side note, I really appreciate how far we've come here in so little time. Our newest contributor Adam David wrote a wonderful piece defending prorogation. Even though I disagree with him, I encourage you to read and comment.
In the mean time, call your MP and complain that he or she isn't in Ottawa doing the work YOU are paying them to do.
We also have a new email address: centreblockblog@gmail.com feel free to email us and complain or comment!
Stay tuned for announcements on new features we hope to introduce in the coming days, weeks, and months.
Keep Watch!
03 January 2010
So you want to prorogue Parliament
So the political blogosphere has been abuzz the last few days with the news that Stephen Harper was planning to, and then did, prorogue Parliament. According to pundits, the world is coming to an end and Prime Minister Harper is taking his dictatorial powers to a new extreme. In other words, this is The Worst Thing Ever to happen to Canadian Democracy.
Time for some sober second thought.
Remember that Parliament is an ancient institution consisting of the Crown, the Senate (House of Lords in England), and the House of Commons. Parliament is called by the Crown; the Executive is selected by the Crown; Parliament considers the Crown's business (although Parliament does claim a number of ancient rights. More on that in a later blog post). The Crown determines what business is conducted and in what order it happens. The Crown also decides when Parliament will sit and for how long.
Ultimately, of course, the Crown is vested in the person of the Queen of Canada: Her Majesty, Elizabeth II and power flows through her representative in Canada, the Governor General, Her Excellency Michaelle Jean. In practice, however, parliamentary business is determined by the government of the day. Barring special circumstances (more on that later), the Governor General must follow the advice of the Prime Minister.
Each election ends a Parliament and starts a new one. The 40th General Election resulted in the start of the 40th Parliament. Each Parliament is divided into "Sessions," during which the Government's business is done. Each Session begins with a Speech from the Throne that lays out the Government's agenda for that Session. The length of each Session is indeterminate in Canada (some Provinces prescribe the lengths of a Session, but the federal government does not) and can, to some extent, be used as part of the political tools of the Government. A Parliament could theoretically have only one Session or as many as the Government of the day wants. In practice, however, a four-year Parliament will generally have three or four Sessions.
To end a Session, the Prime Minister asks the Governor General to prorogue Parliament. All business on the Order Paper disappears, committees do not sit, and no business is done until the Governor General recalls Parliament. Parliament, in effect, resets itself to begin anew with the Government's agenda.
So what's the big deal?
Well, let's look first at the biggest part of this deal: this proroguement happens just when the Government is experiencing some serious scrutiny on the Afghan detainee issue and Parliament will not be able to continue its questioning or demand answers of the Government until after the Olympics, a new Throne Speech, and a Budget in March. The timing looks suspicious, and I can't deny it.
But.
The Tories will, for the first time in 15 years, have a plurality in the Red Chamber when the Prime Minister appoints 5 new Senators this month. The Senate is a great patronage tool for any Government and in spite of his desire to reform the Senate, the Prime Minsiter can, should, and must work with the tools he has at his disposal. So, he'll appoint the Senators and gain some political advantage in the Senate as well as keep the foot soldiers happy in the process.
While the Conservatives might have the advantage in the Senate Chamber, the only way they can hope to gain any kind of advantage in Senate committees is to prorogue Parliament to allow them to reset and realign with the new, more relevant, numbers. This is Parliamentary business and would probably go unnoticed without the detainee issue.
So the question at this point is: do we believe that the Government isn't also using proroguement to avoid the spotlight? You bet they are! Governments use this kind of tool to their advantage all the time! Anyone who thinks otherwise is naive at best. We have to remember that this is something that any Government might do and is not indicative of the Tories being any more evil than anyone else.
Is it an abuse of Parliament? No way. It's not ideal, and certainly not great, but it's not an abuse. We haven't even had an abnormally short Session! The Second Session of the 40th Parliament lasted just under a year, which is a little short of the average, but not outside the realm of possibility.
What does give a lot of people pause is the fact that the 40th Parliament started in Fall 2008 just after the election and was then almost immediately prorogued when Harper was less than tactically brilliant. So they're asking themselves "why prorogue now?" While it's a good and valid question, I think that in almost any other circumstance, these same people wouldn't even blink an eye over the prorogation. It's the Afghan detainee issue and the short First Session that are causing the hue and cry across the nation.
I argue that if it weren't for a general dislike of Prime Minister Harper, we wouldn't be hearing a word about a perfectly routine matter in dealing with Parliamentary business.
Time for some sober second thought.
Remember that Parliament is an ancient institution consisting of the Crown, the Senate (House of Lords in England), and the House of Commons. Parliament is called by the Crown; the Executive is selected by the Crown; Parliament considers the Crown's business (although Parliament does claim a number of ancient rights. More on that in a later blog post). The Crown determines what business is conducted and in what order it happens. The Crown also decides when Parliament will sit and for how long.
Ultimately, of course, the Crown is vested in the person of the Queen of Canada: Her Majesty, Elizabeth II and power flows through her representative in Canada, the Governor General, Her Excellency Michaelle Jean. In practice, however, parliamentary business is determined by the government of the day. Barring special circumstances (more on that later), the Governor General must follow the advice of the Prime Minister.
Each election ends a Parliament and starts a new one. The 40th General Election resulted in the start of the 40th Parliament. Each Parliament is divided into "Sessions," during which the Government's business is done. Each Session begins with a Speech from the Throne that lays out the Government's agenda for that Session. The length of each Session is indeterminate in Canada (some Provinces prescribe the lengths of a Session, but the federal government does not) and can, to some extent, be used as part of the political tools of the Government. A Parliament could theoretically have only one Session or as many as the Government of the day wants. In practice, however, a four-year Parliament will generally have three or four Sessions.
To end a Session, the Prime Minister asks the Governor General to prorogue Parliament. All business on the Order Paper disappears, committees do not sit, and no business is done until the Governor General recalls Parliament. Parliament, in effect, resets itself to begin anew with the Government's agenda.
So what's the big deal?
Well, let's look first at the biggest part of this deal: this proroguement happens just when the Government is experiencing some serious scrutiny on the Afghan detainee issue and Parliament will not be able to continue its questioning or demand answers of the Government until after the Olympics, a new Throne Speech, and a Budget in March. The timing looks suspicious, and I can't deny it.
But.
The Tories will, for the first time in 15 years, have a plurality in the Red Chamber when the Prime Minister appoints 5 new Senators this month. The Senate is a great patronage tool for any Government and in spite of his desire to reform the Senate, the Prime Minsiter can, should, and must work with the tools he has at his disposal. So, he'll appoint the Senators and gain some political advantage in the Senate as well as keep the foot soldiers happy in the process.
While the Conservatives might have the advantage in the Senate Chamber, the only way they can hope to gain any kind of advantage in Senate committees is to prorogue Parliament to allow them to reset and realign with the new, more relevant, numbers. This is Parliamentary business and would probably go unnoticed without the detainee issue.
So the question at this point is: do we believe that the Government isn't also using proroguement to avoid the spotlight? You bet they are! Governments use this kind of tool to their advantage all the time! Anyone who thinks otherwise is naive at best. We have to remember that this is something that any Government might do and is not indicative of the Tories being any more evil than anyone else.
Is it an abuse of Parliament? No way. It's not ideal, and certainly not great, but it's not an abuse. We haven't even had an abnormally short Session! The Second Session of the 40th Parliament lasted just under a year, which is a little short of the average, but not outside the realm of possibility.
What does give a lot of people pause is the fact that the 40th Parliament started in Fall 2008 just after the election and was then almost immediately prorogued when Harper was less than tactically brilliant. So they're asking themselves "why prorogue now?" While it's a good and valid question, I think that in almost any other circumstance, these same people wouldn't even blink an eye over the prorogation. It's the Afghan detainee issue and the short First Session that are causing the hue and cry across the nation.
I argue that if it weren't for a general dislike of Prime Minister Harper, we wouldn't be hearing a word about a perfectly routine matter in dealing with Parliamentary business.
28 December 2009
Adler Watch: Using the troops....
I was listening to Charles Adler once again (I know, shame on me). He was ranting about Heather Malik's article in the guardian (http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/dec/02/embarrassing-canadian-corrupt-petro-state)
With his broadcast, he offered to give her $133 towards offically moving to another country. Why $133 you ask? What could possibly be the signifigance of the number 133?
Because according to him thats how many we have lost in Afghanistan.
First of all he is wrong, its 134, we tragically lost a soldier on Christmas Eve. Secondly, how dare he use the memories of our fallen to try to score cheap political points against someone who has a viewpoint different then he.
Men and women wear the uniform of this country to defend us from our enemies. They have died in too many places defending the liberty of others, and Canadians.
It's the same liberty that Charles Adler takes advantage of when he uses our war dead to build his case of an argument against a fellow opinionist. Charles Adler, you claim to be looking for the "truth". If so, why do you try to obscure it by using our war dead?
Charles Adler, you might just be the worst person on Canadian Radio.
Shame on you.
Keep Watch.
With his broadcast, he offered to give her $133 towards offically moving to another country. Why $133 you ask? What could possibly be the signifigance of the number 133?
Because according to him thats how many we have lost in Afghanistan.
First of all he is wrong, its 134, we tragically lost a soldier on Christmas Eve. Secondly, how dare he use the memories of our fallen to try to score cheap political points against someone who has a viewpoint different then he.
Men and women wear the uniform of this country to defend us from our enemies. They have died in too many places defending the liberty of others, and Canadians.
It's the same liberty that Charles Adler takes advantage of when he uses our war dead to build his case of an argument against a fellow opinionist. Charles Adler, you claim to be looking for the "truth". If so, why do you try to obscure it by using our war dead?
Charles Adler, you might just be the worst person on Canadian Radio.
Shame on you.
Keep Watch.
27 December 2009
Photo Contest anyone?
It's time for the first ever superfantastic extraordinarily cliched Centre Block Photo Challenge.
Our first victi.... I mean our first participant is Jack "Always a bridesmaid, never a bride" Layton:
Our first victi.... I mean our first participant is Jack "Always a bridesmaid, never a bride" Layton:
The submission deadline will be Monday Evening, and I'll post them on Tuesday Morning before I head out of town again for the New Years celebration. Send all submissions to lordbeav@gmail.com
I'll try to post while I'm away via my cell phone.
Have fun and Keep Watch!
26 December 2009
Why the Queen Matters.
My friend Matt, stated on his Facebook Status "We're not bees. Why then do we need a Queen?
The republicans show up after the Queen makes her annual Christmas speech; and they'll be out again in force when HM comes to Canada in 2010.
I myself am a Monarchist, and I believe strongly in the role of the Crown in our country.
However I understand and respect the viewpoints that most republicans in this country have. Most people arguing in favour of a republic are smart, intelligent people that I disagree with.
Allow me to share a few quotations with you, to help you all understand my view of the Crown:
"[The Queen] symbolizes for many the merits of a constitutional monarchy in which the head of state...is separate and apart from the ongoing political struggles of the day." - Bill Blaikie, NDP MP, 2002
""Provinces agree that the system of democratic parliamentary government requires an ultimate authority to ensure its responsible nature and to safeguard against abuses of power. That ultimate power must not be an instrument of the federal Cabinet." - Joint Statement by the 10 Provincial Premiers at 19th Annual Conference, Regina, Aug 9-10, 1978
"...our ability to love inclines most naturally to persons, and in the person of The Queen we can invest all those many fractured loves that make up patriotic love: love of country, love of nation, love of culture, love of land, all combined and channeled through one person, one family..." Andrew Coyne, Columnist, 2002.
"I have a considerable regard for The Queen and the monarchy although I'm a New Democrat and a socialist. I think that the monarchy has validity at a time when everything else is flying off in all directions... I admire her stubborn refusal to break down and take the easy way, to conform with the constantly changing public image of how our leaders should act." - Farley Mowat, Author, 2002
The Crown symbolizes all that is good in Canada: Justice, Fairness, and Liberty. I know some would disagree regarding Liberty, but the Crown is there to protect our liberty from those who might use government to remove it.
The Crown remains as the ultimate safeguard against tyranny. The Canadian Crown exists to unify us through one person, into a single nation. The Crown remains, as always, or Guarentor of Freedom.
The Crown does not belong to the Queen or her heirs; it belongs to us. We are not her servants; she is our servant. The Crown belongs to Canada.
HM Queen Elizabeth has been a steady leader for over 50 years. She continues to serve her people and leads by example, I've already written on how HM showed a good example by taking a standard train for a trip, in solidarity with her people who are suffering in the recession.
During World War Two, her father, George VI, again led by example. Buckingham Palace undertook rationing like any other British Family, and the family never evacuated to safety, as can be summed up in this quotation from the Queen Mother on the subject of evacuation:
"The children won't leave without me. I won't leave without the King - and the King will never leave"
The Queen and her family have given us a lifetime of service, they work for us, they give up their privacy, their right to lead a normal life, all in of duty and service to us.
To close, I'll let the words of HM herself, show why the Crown is relevant and is a powerful force for leadership in this country:
"I declare before you all that my whole life, whether it be long or short, shall be devoted to your service"
"It is my privilege to serve you as Queen of Canada to the best of my ability, to play my part in the Canadian identity, to uphold Canadian traditions and heritage, to recognize Canadian excellence and achievement and to seek to give a sense of continuity in these exciting, ever-changing times in which we are fortunate enough to live. "
Keep Watch.
The republicans show up after the Queen makes her annual Christmas speech; and they'll be out again in force when HM comes to Canada in 2010.
I myself am a Monarchist, and I believe strongly in the role of the Crown in our country.
However I understand and respect the viewpoints that most republicans in this country have. Most people arguing in favour of a republic are smart, intelligent people that I disagree with.
Allow me to share a few quotations with you, to help you all understand my view of the Crown:
"[The Queen] symbolizes for many the merits of a constitutional monarchy in which the head of state...is separate and apart from the ongoing political struggles of the day." - Bill Blaikie, NDP MP, 2002
""Provinces agree that the system of democratic parliamentary government requires an ultimate authority to ensure its responsible nature and to safeguard against abuses of power. That ultimate power must not be an instrument of the federal Cabinet." - Joint Statement by the 10 Provincial Premiers at 19th Annual Conference, Regina, Aug 9-10, 1978
"...our ability to love inclines most naturally to persons, and in the person of The Queen we can invest all those many fractured loves that make up patriotic love: love of country, love of nation, love of culture, love of land, all combined and channeled through one person, one family..." Andrew Coyne, Columnist, 2002.
"I have a considerable regard for The Queen and the monarchy although I'm a New Democrat and a socialist. I think that the monarchy has validity at a time when everything else is flying off in all directions... I admire her stubborn refusal to break down and take the easy way, to conform with the constantly changing public image of how our leaders should act." - Farley Mowat, Author, 2002
The Crown symbolizes all that is good in Canada: Justice, Fairness, and Liberty. I know some would disagree regarding Liberty, but the Crown is there to protect our liberty from those who might use government to remove it.
The Crown remains as the ultimate safeguard against tyranny. The Canadian Crown exists to unify us through one person, into a single nation. The Crown remains, as always, or Guarentor of Freedom.
The Crown does not belong to the Queen or her heirs; it belongs to us. We are not her servants; she is our servant. The Crown belongs to Canada.
HM Queen Elizabeth has been a steady leader for over 50 years. She continues to serve her people and leads by example, I've already written on how HM showed a good example by taking a standard train for a trip, in solidarity with her people who are suffering in the recession.
During World War Two, her father, George VI, again led by example. Buckingham Palace undertook rationing like any other British Family, and the family never evacuated to safety, as can be summed up in this quotation from the Queen Mother on the subject of evacuation:
"The children won't leave without me. I won't leave without the King - and the King will never leave"
The Queen and her family have given us a lifetime of service, they work for us, they give up their privacy, their right to lead a normal life, all in of duty and service to us.
To close, I'll let the words of HM herself, show why the Crown is relevant and is a powerful force for leadership in this country:
"I declare before you all that my whole life, whether it be long or short, shall be devoted to your service"
"It is my privilege to serve you as Queen of Canada to the best of my ability, to play my part in the Canadian identity, to uphold Canadian traditions and heritage, to recognize Canadian excellence and achievement and to seek to give a sense of continuity in these exciting, ever-changing times in which we are fortunate enough to live. "
Keep Watch.
AECL Sale - Blame Canada
Some thoughts I've found on the AECL:
From the Toronto Star:
http://www.thestar.com/opinion/editorials/article/741635--problems-in-aecl-sale
From the Montreal Gazette:
http://www.montrealgazette.com/opinion/editorials/Ottawa+right+reactor+business/2369140/story.html
Now, they both argue the same point - that its our own fault that AECL isn't making money, because no one in Canada is buying CAN Uranium Deuterium (or Nambla) Reactors. So why should the world?
I would have to agree with both editorials. However, this goes far beyond profitability.
This comes down to Jim "The Axe" Flaherty's record as a neo-conservative. He wants to privatize and karate chop the budget. Deep down inside, I think he and Stephen Harper love this recession and destroyed our finances - not because they like to spend; but because when recovery finally sets in, we as a people will regain our senses and oppose deficits, giving Harper and Flaherty free hand to destroy our federal government, and in cases like the AECL selling off our national industries piece by piece.
I can't wait for the CBC to be bought by Rogers...
From the Toronto Star:
http://www.thestar.com/opinion/editorials/article/741635--problems-in-aecl-sale
From the Montreal Gazette:
http://www.montrealgazette.com/opinion/editorials/Ottawa+right+reactor+business/2369140/story.html
Now, they both argue the same point - that its our own fault that AECL isn't making money, because no one in Canada is buying CAN Uranium Deuterium (or Nambla) Reactors. So why should the world?
I would have to agree with both editorials. However, this goes far beyond profitability.
This comes down to Jim "The Axe" Flaherty's record as a neo-conservative. He wants to privatize and karate chop the budget. Deep down inside, I think he and Stephen Harper love this recession and destroyed our finances - not because they like to spend; but because when recovery finally sets in, we as a people will regain our senses and oppose deficits, giving Harper and Flaherty free hand to destroy our federal government, and in cases like the AECL selling off our national industries piece by piece.
I can't wait for the CBC to be bought by Rogers...
23 December 2009
Merry Christmas to all!
I'd like to take wish you all a Merry Christmas.
I won't be available to make any entries until at least Boxing Day, so I thought I'd wish you the safest and happiest of seasons. I know for many this year will be difficult, myself included. But, I'd like to thank you all for your involvement in my little part of the internet.
It is a pleasure to write and take part in the national discourse affecting all of us. 2010 could possibly be one of the most important years in our national life, and I'll be here commenting on it. I encourage you all to read and debate with me so that we can arrive at something close to the truth. I'll also be commenting on the lighter side of life, as well as cultural issues affecting myself and all of us.
If you have the time, feel free to message me at lordbeav@gmail.com !
No matter what party or affiliation, may your holidays be filled with family, love, and joy.
Keep Watch, and Happy Christmas!
I won't be available to make any entries until at least Boxing Day, so I thought I'd wish you the safest and happiest of seasons. I know for many this year will be difficult, myself included. But, I'd like to thank you all for your involvement in my little part of the internet.
It is a pleasure to write and take part in the national discourse affecting all of us. 2010 could possibly be one of the most important years in our national life, and I'll be here commenting on it. I encourage you all to read and debate with me so that we can arrive at something close to the truth. I'll also be commenting on the lighter side of life, as well as cultural issues affecting myself and all of us.
If you have the time, feel free to message me at lordbeav@gmail.com !
No matter what party or affiliation, may your holidays be filled with family, love, and joy.
Keep Watch, and Happy Christmas!
22 December 2009
Stephen "I wouldn't rule out a carbon tax" Harper
http://www.google.com/hostednews/canadianpress/article/ALeqM5jo8RELbW1nuMruYPgRCq38zGX3kA
Do I really need to say anything more?
Do I really need to say anything more?
20 December 2009
Leading by example.
An important rule of leadership is "Lead By Example".
Which leads me to this news article: http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2009/dec/17/queen-train-travel-sandringham
HM the Queen (of the UK, Canada, Australia, et al) has again led her people not by words but by deeds.
The United Kingdom is feeling the effects of this Global Recession, and it was responsible of HM to take the "regular" training instead of the 50K+ pounds it would have cost to have her Royal Train take her.
Perhaps her Prime Minister here in Canada could learn a lesson or two from her most gracious majesty when it comes to the subject of leadership.
Keep Watch.
Which leads me to this news article: http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2009/dec/17/queen-train-travel-sandringham
HM the Queen (of the UK, Canada, Australia, et al) has again led her people not by words but by deeds.
The United Kingdom is feeling the effects of this Global Recession, and it was responsible of HM to take the "regular" training instead of the 50K+ pounds it would have cost to have her Royal Train take her.
Perhaps her Prime Minister here in Canada could learn a lesson or two from her most gracious majesty when it comes to the subject of leadership.
Keep Watch.
Three Years of Silence
After taking power in 2006, the Conservatives feared a new Liberal "Rat Pack":
http://www.nationalpost.com/scripts/story.html?id=ec605037-f7cb-472b-abea-d2bc1b3ef0ea&k=97569
So where are they? Why are the Liberals truly afraid to attack and harass their enemy until victory is won?
Do they believe that silence and false outrage will win the next election?
http://www.nationalpost.com/scripts/story.html?id=ec605037-f7cb-472b-abea-d2bc1b3ef0ea&k=97569
So where are they? Why are the Liberals truly afraid to attack and harass their enemy until victory is won?
Do they believe that silence and false outrage will win the next election?
Icons of our time: Dwight K. Schrute
First of all, I'd like to thank my good friend Kyle for making this his Facebook Profile Picture. I claim no credit for this, I just want to share it with you all!
Keep watch!
Why the success of Avatar matters.
Avatar: $232 Million worldwide in its first weekend. Amazing.
Apparently the film lived up to the hype, which has slowly been building over the last decade. This is good news for us out there who enjoy Hollywood movies. Why? Two words:
Original Idea.
There was no previous franchise (Batman, Star Trek, Transformers, etc). This movie was an original creation and wasn't engrained into our group consciouness before hand, driving demand. You could argue that James Cameron is a franchise unto himself, but this isn't that sort of blog!
Thank you James Cameron for keeping hope alive for an industry which has been as of late just repackaging old ideas, instead of creating new ones. I hope Hollywood will grow on your movies success not my launching a sequal, but by looking out for new ideas that will captivate and entertain audiences here and abroad.
Apparently the film lived up to the hype, which has slowly been building over the last decade. This is good news for us out there who enjoy Hollywood movies. Why? Two words:
Original Idea.
There was no previous franchise (Batman, Star Trek, Transformers, etc). This movie was an original creation and wasn't engrained into our group consciouness before hand, driving demand. You could argue that James Cameron is a franchise unto himself, but this isn't that sort of blog!
Thank you James Cameron for keeping hope alive for an industry which has been as of late just repackaging old ideas, instead of creating new ones. I hope Hollywood will grow on your movies success not my launching a sequal, but by looking out for new ideas that will captivate and entertain audiences here and abroad.
19 December 2009
Guess who didn't come to dinner?
*Slow Claps*
Way to be not invited Mr. Prime Minster.
You are a failure.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
