Ruling the Centre since 2006. The Life and Times of a country called Canada. Politics, Culture, and More.

02 December 2008

Relationship Advice: Ottawa Edition

"I'm sorry, I'll never do it again"

Six words every man needs to learn.

I'm not even married and I know how important these six words are to ensuring a good relationship.

Now last week, everyone's sweater toting Prime Minister made a couple boo-boo, big ones. He politicized an Economic Update. That was mistake #1, well then he went ahead and made mistake #2 by not apologizing.

It was more or less the political equivelent of forgetting your anniversary.

The next day after he attempted to knee-cap the opposition, Mr. Harper could have risen and said "Mr. Speaker, I'm Sorry, I'll never do it again". He could have even bought the three party leaders some flowers.

Instead of acting like an adult, he acted like a Child, and he got a childish response, and now we are in the midst of a political and perhaps constitutional crisis.

Is the Prime Minister the only one to blame? No. But if he wants to be our Prime Minister he should start acting like it. Sometimes that means admitting a mistake.

I think all of our political leaders need to have a girly drink with Carrie Bradshaw in Manhattan and have a good cry, and work it out.

Now for a solution, bring in another Union Government like we did during World War One. We are facing tough economic times, and we need the government working instead of bickering. However they aren't grownups, we elected Children.


I'm sure we'll see the Blue Sweater get pulled out of the dresser.

30 November 2008

A Very Super Parade

Brantford should be proud of itself!

As a participant in the Santa Clause Parade for over a decade, and before that a spectator for over another decade, I have seen many a parade.

This year was perhaps the finest though, the entire route from what I noticed was lined at least 3 deep and in many places much more. The weather was awesome, usually I am frozen solid after that long march, this year though I was fine.

Personally, the Band I was performing with sounded awesome, and from hearing the warm-ups in the Band staging area I know the other bands sound spectacular.

From what I saw on Rogers the floats looked pretty good, I'm not sure what other cities have, but I think we can safely say we have one of the best.

I was glad to see that good ole Saint Nick stopped by Harmony Square, its great to have a place for the parade to end and kick off a season of skating. We should all be proud of our annual Santa Clause Parade!

I look forward to the 2009 Parade, I have no doubt that JCI will organize another great parade, our horns are already warming up for next November, lets hope the temperature is the same next year.

27 November 2008

Another Government Intrusion

I came across this on CTV:

http://toronto.ctv.ca/servlet/an/local/CTVNews/20081127/cigarillios_081127/20081127/?hub=TorontoNewHome

I'm not a smoker, but this is a needless intrusion into the lives of Ontarians. Where are these intrusions coming from? Powerful lobby groups.

Last week it was poorly devised rules about new drivers pushed by MADD and others.
This week it is banning flavoured cigarillios pushed by the Canadian Cancer Society.
Do you see a trend developing? Our politicans are being pushed around by lobby groups with agendas.

Whats the next step? The Temperance Union making a come back and denying me the liberty of going to the pub and enjoying a pint?

I'm all for laws that protect the common good. Drunk Driving laws are an example, so are laws banning things like murder, or perhaps a economic stimulus package that will keep people working, and things such an environmental initatives. But sometimes enough is a enough.
Our politicans have far more important things to worry about. Our economy is weakening and Ontario for the first time ever became a "have-not province", our ecosystems are being destroyed by our dependence on oil.

Yet our elected representatives are wasting their time legistlating our lives. We are to blame for this, we have let the government get far too involved in our day to day lives. Pierre Trudeau once said, the state has no place in the bedroom's of the nation. He's right, and we ought to stand up and tell the government their job is to keep us safe, provide education and health care, keep the economy regulated, and give the less fortunate a hand-up.

I encourage you to contact your MPP and MP and tell them we want to them to stop legislating our lives, and getting to back to the real jobs at hand. Remember they are our employees, we are management, not them.

26 November 2008

Hi, my name is Canada, and I have a problem.

Over the last month we have seen gas prices drop to levels we have seen in years. This has been caused be a couple of things (though these aren't the only reasons):

  1. People cutting back on driving due to prices.
  2. Less demand due to the current economic climate.


Now before we pull our SUV's out of the garage and celebrate with a drive out to California and back, let us resolve to send a message, we are ending our addiction to oil.

I urge you to continue to buy the fuel efficient cars, the hybrids, the smaller cars, etc. Keep carpooling, keep walking or taking public transit. Park the car and walk into the Tim Hortons instead of idling in the Drive-Thru(through?).

On a side-bar, if you are in the drive-thru at Tim Hortons you better only be buying coffee and donuts, otherwise you are wasting everyone's time. The drive-thru is for Coffee and Donuts only.
Kick the habit, and in the next couple of years, if you can afford it, go out and buy those next Generation Cars, like the Chevy Volt our the Plug-In Prius.

The only way this economy will truly recover is if we invest in the New Energy Economy, without oil.

As with any addiction, the first step is realizing you have a problem.

21 November 2008

200 Reads and Counting

My friends with this post, I will exceed a total over 200 reads, a momentus occasion, as I have only been writing here on brantNOW.com for a short time.

So far my three most popular posts have been: Downtown Delays, Watching the Planets, and by Top 10 List for incoming MP Phil McColeman.

Since you folks are reading, I am going to keep writing. I'd like to thank you for your readership so far, I know with all the different aspects of brantNOW.com that reading my blog could be an easy oversight. But so far you've made it a success.

I do have a request for you though, I am sure that 100% of you do not agree with me. I don't expect it, and I expect to be challenged. If you want to have a discussion, please head over the Forums where you will meet a willing foe for a friendly debate on the issues. There are already numerous excellent discussions in progress and your added voice would be welcome! I warn you though come with evidence to back you up!

It's been a pleasure so far, prepare for my Top 10 List for former MP Lloyd St. Amand, it'll be a riot!

I'll see you when I see you.

18 November 2008

10 Things Phil McColeman Should Do

1. Get Chuck Strahl* to come to Brantford and begin the process of settling the Land Claims Issue. Do this and re-election is in the bag.

2. Realize that you are a backbencher - don't overstep (no press conferences in the National Press Gallery until your second term). Harper doesn't seem to like noise coming from behind him; I think he is easily startled. That said, don't be a yes man, you work for us, not him.

3. Visit Brantford as much as possible. While it's important that you represent our interests, make it a point to be back at least twice a month if not more. We don't want an Ottawa Resident as our Member of Parliament. Consider Ottawa to be a smelly place, and the longer you stay there the worst you smell. We like fresh smelling MPs.

4. See #1.

5. See #4.

6. Give good speeches - short, to the point, and where appropriate funny. Hire an unemployed Political Science student to write speeches for you. There is lots to choose from, so don't worry about having to pay them a lot.

7. We want action, not talk. Your predecessors delivered action; we expect the same from you. Use that Poli Sci student to draft some policy for you.

8. Get us government goodies, you said we needed a MP on the Government side of the House of Commons, prove it. Every time you do #3 on this list, you better have a big cheque with you.

9. Be the leader we need, not the leader we want. These are serious times and it calls for serious leadership. Don't do what's popular, do what is right. If a vote with the government will hurt Brant - vote against it. If you get removed from caucus, so be it, you stood up for your constituents and that's what matters most. You'll win respect and votes in the next election. Remember, your predecessor lost after doing a good job, we in Brantford aren't afraid to fire people to give someone else a chance.

10. See #1-9, repeat as often as necessary.

Please see Comment #3 for explanation.

17 November 2008

Sabotaging Industry

http://www.brantfordexpositor.com/ArticleDisplay.aspx?e=1299537

A few weeks ago, I was pleased to see in the news that a company had decided to located at the currently vacant Blue Bird Bus Co Factory on Highway 53.

Today, I saw that local residents were attempting to hamstring a potential 100 jobs from arriving to our areas. There was reference to a residents home value. Guess what, your house will be worth nothing if the local economy collapses. We need those jobs.

As for enviromental concerns, I agree, all projects should go through rigourous potential enviroment impact analysis.

As for noise? My goodness, you live next to an Airport, and upto a few years ago one of the largest bus factories in North America, how could that be silent.

It's hard enough to encourage development in the area due to the Land Claims Issue, we had someone wanting to bring jobs, lets assume that 100 employees at an average of 45 000/year = 4.5 Million dollars coming into the economy each year.

We are in a near recession, we cannot afford to have these jobs move somewhere else. If I see the petition they want me to sign, I'll say "No thanks"

12 November 2008

Downtown Delays

My goodness! It's impossible to drive downtown these days.

With all the delivery trucks, construction, and pedestrians breathing life in to our downtown, it brings to mind, whats the plan?

The City has a downtown revitalization plan, but to see it in action you see a collection of individual efforts to revitalize our central core. The City of Brantford website states "The Downtown Master Plan will identify the action items necessary to achieve this outcome of Councils approved Community Strategic Plan, to make Brantford's "downtown vibrant and successful- the hub for its citizens, students, businesses, visitors and government".
So far, so good right?

A visit to their site shows numerous reports - but I find no eventual goal other to make it vibrant and successful.

How do we want our downtown to be shaped? Do we want it to be a burgeoning university district with cafes, shops, etc to service students? Perhaps instead we want to encourage businesses and professionals to set up shop? Or do we want both?

We need a plan and course accessible to all citizens - I call on our leaders to communicate its plan with us.

Need for News - Originally Posted : 12 Nov 08

125 000 people.

That's what Statistics Canada states is the approximate population of the Brant. How many major sources of news and opinions are there?

Two.

The Brantford Expositor and CKPC are no doubt diligent and hardworking media entities. But, how many people outside of their place of business listen to CKPC? What do people read first, the Expositor or the Toronto Star, National Post, or Globe and Mail? Is it not a sad fact that these questions even need to be raised?

There is a saying, all politics is local. We only get two sources for political news, that's it. HI'm not questioning the integrity of the Brantford Expositor, but one source of news does not serve the democratic interests of our citizens. I'm sure Mr. St Amand in 2004 and 2006 can tell you how important the Expositor's endorsement was to his electoral success in those elections. I'm also sure that Mr. McColeman can tell you how important it was this year in his upset of Mr. St Amand.

My point, the Expositor is a trusted source of news and opinion due to its fact it is the only source of news in town. There is no discourse, no differing opinions. The Expositor can't cover all the news, how many critical stories about the issues and about the residents of our area have been left unheard because of the limited resources of the only paper in town.

A well-informed citizenry is essential to the ideals of democracy and community. We need to hold the fire to the feet of our elected representaives, and the only method we have is the media.
In this year 2008, we should begin the task of moving past the media of previous generations and embrace the so-called "new media". We can't expect this city to join the 21st century if we rely on the media of the 20th. Your city deserves better, your neighbour deserves better, you deserve better, and your children, our future, deserves better.

04 November 2008

Obama - 103 EV; McCain - 34 EV

MSNBC says Obama wins Pennsylvania.

Obama leads on Ohio, Florida, North Carolina. McCain in Indiana and Virginia.

The results are interesting. McCain is still alive, sorta. But losing Pennslyvania was perhaps a bad omen.

If the Gary area goes for Obama he'll likely take Indiana.

The dream might be coming true.

Obama for America.

Election Watch: 3:15pm

Here I am, waiting impatiently for the first polls to close in the United States.

I have say, I am cautiously optimistic, but scared of what might be. Can all the polls possibly be wrong?

If they are, I truly fear for the future, and weep for it as well, because in the year 2008 our neighbours from the south could have revolutionized they way the world sees them.

I'm not unbiased, I wish and pray for an Obama Victory. It's days like today I wish I was a US Citizen.

At this point, I have just three words: Obama for America

28 October 2008

Not seeing the big picture.

Campbell Brown wrote an opinion article about Barack Obama's "broken promise" regarding accepting public financing.

You can see her article here: http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/10/28/campbell.brown.obama/index.html

8:00PM is no offically the No News Hour on all three US News Networks. We have Bill O'Reilly on FNC; Keith Olbermann on MSNBC; and now Ms. Brown on CNN.

But thats another point.

The point I am making is that Sen. Obama had no choice put to revolutionize the fundraising apperatus in order to survive. He wouldn't have been able to fight of the McCain/RNC Attack Ads if he had handicapped himself with Public Financing.

Mr. Obama has involved people in politics in a way not seen in generations. If he is successful in one week's time we'll be talking about the Obama Revolution like we now talk about the Reagan Revolution.

Yes, the US needs campaign finance reform. But I don't think Obama so much as broke a promise, but instead was realistic. And isn't that what everyone wants in a Commander In Chief?

McKenna is Out.

http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20081028/mckenna_leadership_081028/20081028?hub=TopStories

Frank McKenna has again announced he will not run for the Liberal Leadership.

Its looking more and more likely to be a Ignattieff vs Rae Battle.

27 October 2008

Obama's Final Argument...

... well sort of.

Obama will apparnetly be giving his "closer" in Ohio today. MSNBC reveals a heartwarming line : “The change we need isn’t just about new programs and policies. It’s about a new politics -- a politics that calls on our better angels instead of encouraging our worst instincts; one that reminds us of the obligations we have to ourselves and one another.”

We'll see how it plays, and rest assured if it needs tinkering we'll see it in Obama's 30 Minute Ad coming this Wednesday.

Needless to say, on paper it seems like a powerful line, and Obama will likely deliver on it.

Until next time my friends.

26 October 2008

Things to Come

There are changes coming to The Centre Block. We are planning an expansion of our content. We have added some balance by adding some contributors.

Just recently "In Media Res" our voice from the west has posted. Soon you will see some from Matt B and Lucas Timmons, Mr. Timmons is our local Libertarian and I assure you will antagonize us who disagree. However he is a very smart man and will make you think about the issues.

Matt B is man dedicated to reason and his arguments will keep you coming back for more.

We are a centrist blog. This is why we make our additions. True political discource requires multiple point of view. I hope you'll join us here as we debate issues local, national, and international.

We'll also be having some fun. Keep reading, because we'll keep writing.

25 October 2008

Confident and Smug

Indeed, Chretien exudes(ed) a respectable confidence in carrying out his duties; in retirement, he's also allowed to be a little bit smug. When several Canadian banks had it in their mind to merge (in 1998), arguing it would make them more competitive, the government blocked the deals from going through. Mr. Chreitien, though unwittingly, has left us in a generally favourable position heading into the current economic crisis; for this we ought to be appreciative.

Canada's Most Poopular Leader


He's still here, haunting us. Arguably, Jean Chretien is Canada's most popular living politician. Even for all those who hate him, the facts are undeniably there that he won three back to back majorities.

I won't apologize for his faults or accused scandals, but the guy is unbelievable. He has an unshakable confidence in himself, excluding the 1995 Referendum, but I think that year the entire nation had little confidence. Something which I think our current cabal of leaders lack. Yes, Harper seems confident, but I always get from him that he is unsure of himself.

I'm going to argue that Canada has lacked true leadership on the national stage for quite some time. No one inspires us anymore.

Here's hoping for a great Liberal Convention.

Poor Alberta

I'm not an expert. But it seems the current slide in oil won't help Alberta any. Combined with the Alberta Gov't new royalty plan, is it possible that their economy might tank too?

24 October 2008

The Down Ballot Struggle Begins

I just saw this ad on Ben Smith's Politico Blog.



With Obama starting to wrap up his presidential campaign, it appears he is starting to let people ride on his coattails.

Though If I were him I would want to make sure that no party has a veto proof majority.

Expect more of this as the Democrats go for the trifecta this year.

On a side note, I have been living on Politico for the last few weeks. Sadly, there is no Canadian version.

Deficit Night in Canada?

Welcome to the 1980s.

Trudeau ushered in the era of big deficits, and Mulroney kept it going. Now after over a decade of surpluses we are going to have to sit through a blast from the past.

Yesterday, the Ontario Government announced a $500M deficit, today the Federal Finance Minister Jim Flaherty said we might not be able to avoid it, but he is "confident" we can.

Its time to bring out the scalpal (not the axe) and start trimming the budget. Perhaps it wasn't such a great idea to slash the GST after all.

A Commitment to more posts.

My friends (I guess thats cliche now).

I have from time to time decided to post to The Centre Block. Now is the time for me to commit myself to blogging more than I have.

In today's economic and political climate it is more important than ever before for citizens to report their opinions and the facts they can find. In the past this was a difficult thing to do. Now with the advent of the internet we no longer need to sit quietly.

Martin Luther King Junior spoke of the fierce urgency of now during the Civil Rights movement. On the verge of the next era in Canadian and World politics, I along with all of you will be here saving the world through our words.

21 October 2008

Liberal Leadership

So its begun. Now that the campaign has begun, let us look at a few contenders:

Michael Ignattieff: The Philosopher King. He is arguable the strongest of the contenders for the leadership, and most likely the candidate the Conservatives don't want. However, his long abence from the country is still an open sore.

Bob Rae: Potential Leader of the "Unite the Left" movement, however, Bob Rae is still toxic in Ontario, and as the last election has shown, Ontario is no longer a Liberal Fortress. To win it back they'll need a leader who can rebuild the party's fortune in Central Canada.

Gerard Kennedy: The Dealmaker. He was a strong enough candidate in the last campaign that he won it from Dion. However, will that strength remain? It can be argued in hindsight that his efforts have harmed the Liberal Party.

Frank McKenna: Premier, Ambassador, Businessman. Likely Bay Street's choice for Liberal Leader. He's bilingual (though apparently rusty).

Jane Stewart: She was apparently the successor Chretien wanted. She threw herself on the media grenade of the HRDC. There was a small "Draft Jane" movement in 2006, its unknown if she would take the plunge or not.

There are numerous others, but it'll be a short campaign, expect an Ignattieff or Rae victory.

25 March 2008

A "Tory" Response

A friend of mine, who is also a contributor, and myself have been debating recently the merits of a Canadian Republic. He is a proponent of such a change, myself I believe the status quo of this nation being a constiutional monarchy; it has served us well since 1867 and is stable enough that it should last as long as this nation retains its status as an independent nation.

He argues through most of his post about Empires and the negative effects Empire has had on Canada over the last 140+ years - to start off and make things more simple, let me concede the point that Imperialism/Colonialism is counter-productive to the growth and development of the modern nation-state.

Let me make my case for why Canada should continue to retain the Monarchy (read: Governor-General):

1) Provides for non-partisan execution of the powers of the Head of State. We can see in the United States how the partisan "vision" of the presidency can often lead to problems with the legislative branch of Government. The Monarchy is not the symbol of one politican party or another; but instead all Canadians.

2) The Monarchy can lend its voice and influence to causes that are sometimes overlooked by partisan bickering in the House of Commons and the Senate. Aboriginal Affairs; Women's Rights; Development of a Uniquely Canadian Identity have all been heralded by the Queen's representative.

3) Specific to Queen Elizabeth II, she keeps abreast of Canadian affairs even with a representative in Ottawa. She has been known to advise Prime Ministers of the best courses of action - her experience is unparalelled she has ruled as monarch for over 50 years. Her first British Prime Minister was Sir Winston Churchill; her first Canadian Prime Minister was Louis St. Laurent.

4) Canada was not designed as a republic. My friend in his post spoke of the "great experiement" of the US Republic. Canada, as much younger nation has been just as much as a testbed of ideas as the United States. The adoption of the Charter shows this. In terms of Human Rights and Social Policy we were not stained of the "original sin" of Slavery - we remain light years ahead of our southern neighbour.

5) If it ain't broke, don't fix it.

God Save the Queen, God Save Canada.

24 March 2008

A More Perfect Union

Pouring Sugar in the Gas Tank

This is where I have gotten my inspiration for my post: http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20080324/flaherty_ontario_080324/20080324?hub=TopStories

Ontario is considered to be the economic engine of this country - with 40% of the population Ontarians hold much economic clout and as much their fears of the "R" word should be met with optimism.

However, the Federal Finance Minister Jim Flaherty in a partisan attempt at winning votes for the Federal Conservatives in the next federal election is goading Premier McGuinty into a fight over business taxes. Going as far as saying that Ontario is the least desirable place in Canada in which to run a business.

Being pro-business is fine; but branding the economic engine of the country as being the least desirable place to run a business is akin to pouring sugar into the gas tank of a car. It is irresponsible of the Finance Minister to speak like this. Canadians deserve better then a partisan hack dispensing "advice" to the provinces; especially Ontario which contributes more to Federal coffers then it receives back from the Federal Government. We've paid our dues and then some. Ontario's money goes to "equalization" (of which this author supports - in theory) and in response we get our economy hamstrung by the statements of an incompetent Finance Minister.

Say what you will about the dithering Paul Martin as Prime Minster; but he ran a tight ship as the Finance Minister and led this country (with the help of Uncle Jean) out of the economic wilderness and set us on the path of prosperity. For fiscal conservatives, the Harper regime is proving themselves as spendaholics and are treading very close to deficit spending - which will only serve to weaken our economy while we are tending to weather the recent economic storm down south well.

Jim Flaherty is not one to speak - his work as a Provincial Cabinet Minister during the dark years of Mike Harris destroyed the public infrastructure of this province.

Dalton McGuinty is right - this time. Ontarians of every politician stripe needs to stand behind our government and demand that Ottawa supports Ontario's economy - for the benefit of the whole nation.

Stephen Harper needs to reign in his Finance Minister - or be prepared to face the consequences in Ontario in the next Election.

The illusion of the Dominion, the dream of the Republic.

The following is inspired from a post from my other blog that has become stagnant.
You can read the original here:

http://gebrauchmusikblog.blogspot.com/2006/10/republic-of-canada.html

I have decided to edit it and add a bit more to make it relevant.

A good friend of mine and I were talking a number of days ago about an officer at the Royal Military College who disagreed with the military’s rule that members of the forces must toast the reigning monarch. Refusing to do this it would be considered disloyal, which has accompanying punishments, all of which I am unsure of and so will not quote here.

To me, this brings up two very interesting issues:
1 - What role does Empire (both American and British) have in Canada?
2 - Would shedding our imperial heritage really hurt Canada?

Some dear friends of mine say that the Monarchy and our ties with the UK are what defines us and keeps us from becoming American. I disagree with this statement. Canada has done a fine job of feigning off Americanism albeit in the name of the “Commonwealth and Empire,” however, our reluctance to define what it is to be Canadian and our reliance on pretending to remain loyal to The Empire (that never gave a damn about us anyways) has skewed reality.

But, a friend told me, the monarchy recognizes the importance of Canada! The Queen Mum once replied to the question as to whether she was English or Scottish and replied that she was Canadian – she was probably drunk, and good on her for it! Much like her reply, our perception is based on selective memory, and gin.

It is because of the insecurities we have about our identity that we keep the Governor General, the Lieutenant Governors and our constitutional monarchy. Canadian tax payers are supporting institutions that archaic at best and wasteful at worst. It is time to perfect the grand American experiment. It is time for a Canadian Republic.

Our clutching to the constitutional monarchy is not surprising though, as WASP Canadians have for time immemorial had a romantic relationship with the Empire (a romantic and very one-sided relationship). Canadians have died for the follies of Empires over and over again. Canadians have been willing to gulp up the tripe fed to us. much like the rhetoric we see south of our boarder today. Much as the Spanish American War was fought because of WR Hearst's jingoism, so too Canadians were easily convinced that the Boers in South Africa were barbaric and a direct threat to the morals and authority established by the Empire (as defined by the so-called ‘White Man’s Burden’). Does this situation sound familiar?

Six times more during the 20th Century Canada would both directly and indirectly come to the aid of Empires that had created their own messes. In each of these situations, just as in the Boer War, many Canadians wanted to, and did, believe in the nobility of their fight and fought proudly and valiantly. It is in these wars that we are told we defined ourselves as a nation. But at what price was this nationhood, and who determined the currency? As it turns out, blood, slaughter and victory are the price – decided by those who used the same to build the Empires we have so gallantly defended. We’ve been lied to and abused and we should be very pissed off.


WWI


The slaughter/blood bath that was Belgium and France between the years 1914-1918 is where we tell ourselves that Canada finally became a nation. Vimy was where the stupidity and incompetence of the French and British generals was finally tossed aside. The Canadian contingent decisively beat the ‘Huns’ holding the ridge and marched into history as an army that wasn't lead by idiots and half-wits, an army that wasn’t lead by the imperial generals. The cost for this, however, was a great deal more than the trials of Vimy.

We also had to endure the Somme, Ypres, Passchendaele, the Marne, and countless others. Why? Because the "Great" Empires of Europe had been pointing loaded guns at each other for 50 years, just waiting to see who pulled the trigger first. The "Dreadnought Gap" (sound oddly familiar?) fuelled the first major arms race that lead to the Great War. And when the first shots were fired, Johnny Canuck gladly picked up his rifle and marched to the Maple Leaf Forever to the killing fields of Europe in support of the only thing we ever knew - the Empire.


WWII


This was the only war with an actual cause. A downtrodden and vanquished Germany that had been allowed to rot and fester for 10 years wanted revenge and respect. The Second World War really started the day the Treaty of Versailles was signed. In 1919 the victors basked in their dismantling and humiliation of the defeated Germany, when they were just as responsible for the war as she was. The apathy of three empires - British, French and American - let Germany rise once again, this time to single-handedly terrorize two continents under a ruthless and brutal man. These Empires’ lethargy in actually carrying out the stipulations laid out at Versailles led to Canadians once again being called on to defend the Empire that partially created its own mess. “The New World” came to defend the old (as paraphrased from Churchill when he was calling on the USA to aid Europe). But who was already defending the Old World? The Royal Canadian Navy, the Canadian Merchant Marine, the RCAF and the Canadian Army - we fought in North Africa and Italy, and had our own beach at Normandy. How was Canada rewarded? Dieppe. After all of our dedication and success we were still colonists; we were still guinea pigs.

Korea

A change in Empires: the Huns had been punished, and now the ‘commies’ were the enemy – the threat to freedom and liberty. Was the Korean War a police action or a flexing of might? This war was a challenge to the American Empire’s dominance in the Pacific. The world was once again convinced of the validity of the fight and marched in step with an Empire asserting its might.

Vietnam

Superficial defiance though the protection of dissenters (draft dodgers) masked the silent compliance and assistance to the American cause. Economically Canada was very supportive of the US war effort, of our big brother to the south.

Iraq I

A brutal dictator (who was openly supported economically and militarily by the US government) finally disobeyed his American masters. After the spin and jingoism were done, there was still lots of room on the bandwagon for Canada and the rest of the world to jump on. “How dare Saddam invade the small, peaceful, liberty-loving nation of Kuwait?” we all asked. But the real question was “How dare Saddam fly in the face of Washington?” Suddenly, the US government claimed to care about the human rights abuses that occurred in Iraq (such as the use of gas on Kurdish Iraqis); conveniently overlooking the fact that that gas had been procured from the United States. We weren’t told about that and suddenly, the world was ready to fight for freedom once again.

Afghanistan

“The enemy of my enemy is my friend” syndrome led to American support of the extremist Taliban in fighting off the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. Afghanistan, a very progressive country, was left as spoils to the Taliban after the Soviets withdrew. They did what they wished with the population, human rights be damned. As the Russians withdrew, so, too, did the concern of the Americans. And today, Canada is left, once again, fighting a war caused by the ignorance and arrogance of an empire - exactly where we found ourselves 100 years ago.

Why are we in Afghanistan? Because a CIA-trained, American-supported “freedom fighter”-turned-America hater decided to molest American interests around the world. Only after this campaign culminated in the 911 attacks did the American government become “concerned” with human rights abuses in Afghanistan (which, let us not forget, were perpetrated under the very people they had armed and left to govern it).

Once again, our men and women are fighting a noble fight to right wrongs and establish peace, order and good government following the meddling screw-ups of our imperialist neighbour to the south.

At what cost do we continue to support such imperial ambitions? We have already forgotten the lessons learned from Britain’s lofty ambitions, and now fondly remember, as we wave our Union Jacks and sing Land of Hope and Glory, a time when the “sun never set on the British Empire” (a saying to which Henri Bourassa once shot back that it “only goes to prove that not even god trusts the British in the dark”).

It is time to move on and away from our imperial mother and big brother countries. We need to lead by example, through tolerance, understanding and democratic rule. The American Republic was an experiment in those values; the outcome has so far proven to be another empire.

The Republic Canada would be a grand experiment, and one in which I believe we would succeed.

23 March 2008

Canadian Citizenship for Obama

Canadians need to stop whining about how we perceive ourselves - French, English, Newfoundlander, Westerner etc - and start working together to make this world a better place.

Very rarely can one look at a news service's paper or website and not find some person somewhere complaining how their region of Canada is misunderstood/needs more money/isn't given enough of a say. The very reason why we have so much regionalism in Canada is not because we're so big, but because we lack a leader who is willing to say "yes we are all different, now lets get over that and start working together." Barack Obama says that, and for the sake of the free world, I hope he believes it.

When is a political leader in Canada going to stand up and say "we're all in this boat together so lets make a go of it?" We don't have to agree, but we have to stop being divided. Division being the tested neo-conservative strategy of slamming all opposition. The Harper government is not above this. Furthermore, its survival has only been prolonged by the ineffectiveness and apathy of the opposition leaders.

Mr Dion may have been a great diplomat and back room politician, but it seems he is so afraid of an election because he knows he will lose, and inevitably lose his place as leader. The people are tired of listening to Mr Layton, if they ever actually did in the first place... And the Bloc... they're part of the problem in the first place. The Green Party, who?

If the Americans decide they don't want Barack Obama, I'd take him. He has a vision, and not a crazy vision either like Martin Luther(not MLK Jr if you were wondering). His is a real vision of hope and togetherness, which sounds like a bunch of hooey, but I think it's exactly what we need.